Help
Sign In
co-inspiration
August 2008 
Our steady attention...
Posted on Aug 29th, 2008
by 
Duri
Duri
Our steady attention to what is moving us
in the luminous moments of co-inspiration
transforms the fleeting experience into continuous celebration
of the awakening of the collective learner
to its potential for higher intelligence and wisdom,
capable to hold more compassion and complexity.
in the luminous moments of co-inspiration
transforms the fleeting experience into continuous celebration
of the awakening of the collective learner
to its potential for higher intelligence and wisdom,
capable to hold more compassion and complexity.
Access: Public
Adding steady and responded intention….and the courage to embrace darkness too..
There is a space where moments of enlightenment and endarkenment are all the same.
No difference, whatsoever.
There is a space where we keep moving from dark moods to luminous moodlessness.
A whole world of difference.
Being at home in both spaces is the promised land of humanness.
Thank you, Albert, for the reminder.
Absolutely!
George, I am not refering here to dark moods, shadow, dark night of the soul or ohter of these more specific issues.
But to the world of unknown. Nobody of us is God.
I refer to waht Russ Volckmann in one of this years isues of ILR said.
We are strangers in a strange world. In the sense not even the most elaborated theoretical, conceptual and paradigmatic approach gives final certainty. Evoltuion from the first shamans in early tribal groups to the next Nobel Prize Winners of next decades and all the space which is already mappped out…
Acting in this montsrous universe (Peter Sloterdijk in Belgium last year at Royal Academy) is the promised land. Yes. Bringing together boldness and audacaious action with deep humility….
> Nobody of us is God.
Not only that, but nobody of us, alone, can be. Fortunately that doesn't prevent humankind from moving towards Omega point, if that's what we're moving towards… Who knows… it is in the kingdom of unknown.
Nevertheless the experience of our steady shared-attention (and intention, as you said) to what is moving us, which awakens the collective learner, is real. I mean as real as we remain curious to what it is.
Yes..and its great and a privilege for me, George to learn with and from you. As one of the greatest. pioneers of Collective Intelliigence on this planet you have given me most decisive impulses last years. You are a big evolutionar mentor.
Recommend to all this blog entry from you:
People Power Will Become An Explosive Foirce In History
Co-creating with you,
Albert
ah, Albert, you disappoint me… :-)
i came back to continue our “Zen combat”
Ok…):)
En Garde!
Talking about “Zen combat” (kidding), did I tell you that I started taking up Aikido (no kidding!)?
At the end of of my first training workshop, I told my fellow aikodokas, I am a living proof that even an old dog can learn new tricks…
Back to our theme. Checking new Intgral leadership eview and especially first feedbacks from Integral Theory Confrence I am much resonating with Mark Edwards who stresses the limiation of EVERY conceptual approach. I am going even further.
Where is the origin of insight and realization? I blogged something here:
Instapundit, Pandit, Poets and Pioneer of Physics
The take of Goethe is my favorite one.
> Whereas Goethe said the first conscious remembrance of a thought is the Big Bang Schiller insisted the very origin is in the darkness and mystery of the unconscious.
What if both were true? In my experience, pre-thoughts frequently start in the murkiness of felt sense and in my good days, when I am relaxed enough to listen what it says, they transform into words or images. I love when they surprise me with a “I couldn't have possible thought this” feeling. In those moments, their connection with the Big Bbang is clear: they are manifestations of the same evolutionary inmperative or creative urge.
Exactly! Yes…both seem to be true. For me a kind of uncertainty relation like Heisenberg described. And we know the whole Cophenhagen School of Quantum Theory did never have consensus with Einsteins take. Gott würfelt nicht.:):)
However both, the Copehnhagen School and followers of Einstein could be maybe integrated later in a yet unseen new helicopter view….
And I like those surprises you describe too.:)
I like it when the most dissonant and/or seeminly contradicitve impulses emerge and converge in unpredictable directions…and moments..O yes:):)
Do you know why do you like that? Asking myself the same question, I notice the rejoicing of the Whole in becoming better connected to its unseen potential? Does it make sense to you?
Yes. it does.
I love you guys.